Today I have my Mock-Mock Trial at 1:00 (the two sides of the RM team play each other), and I find I have: no Closing, and a morally ambiguous cross. Actually, there's really nothing morally ambiguous about tormenting a grieving mother with questions to the effect of, "Ha, guess you didn't know precious Jessica quite as well as you thought, huh?" I think if I have time today I'll draw flames in the margins of my cross notes - or else I'll cartoonize legal concepts, as Sandy and I have been doing periodically during meetings, drawing, for example, the Field of Danger (a football field with an fence around it, composed of rifles, swords, tanks, etc. - for some reason also an electric field). Er, I don't have any great ideas right now, but I have been meaning to draw a House-as-Instrumentality-of-Death (probably with fangs).
Since I've been so anxious lately, I've been asked several times what enjoyment I get out of Mock Trial. The enjoyment is twofold (hehe): one, very importantly, is the inside jokes, which are most likely a desperate coping mechanism for being seventeen and dressing up in little lawyer suits to smooth-talk the acquital of two deadbeat, drug-using kid-killers. Also, I have to admit, it's nice to win, and it's very reassuring to prevail consistently in something difficult. I enjoy Mock Trial for that feeling directly after a successful trial - when the next trial is forever away, and we're really giggly during Mr. Evans' post-match criticisms (akin to rehearsal notes), and I can't believe I really have to go home and do all my homework and be in high school.
In non-Mock Trial related news, I recently watched American Pie 2 and Fight Club. No contest as to which was better, or which had hotter leads (grin). The former brought me back to a delightfully embarrassing experience over the summer, watching American Pie with family in Boston. My college-aged, male cousin put it on at my sister's (age thirteen) and my behest, and then, at the last minute, my mom joined us too; my sister and I suggested she shouldn't, but that only made her more in the mood for a raunchy teen comedy. I felt sort of horrified on my cousin's behalf, as he winced visibly at each erection joke - and then my sister asked naive questions, and my mom gave knowledgeable answers. Ah, poor guy. Poor me (wink). Anyway, the sequel is arguably much worse of a movie, though I have trouble claiming to enjoy either.
Seth asked me, mockingly, what I thought of the films from a feminist standpoint. I actually did think it was kind of nice, though crudely done, how they turn cinema's voyeurism (note how many naked women you see in movies, versus naked men) in on itself to play with the boys. In the first movie, the lead character attempts to capture a hot classmate undressing on his webcam, successfully gets on camera a series of male fantasies, and then ends up broadcasting his own sexual humiliation, as she takes control of the situation.
The second movie goes further, starting with a lesbian fantasy (as basically everyone in the movie secretly watches/listens to two hot women trying on each other's bikinis), and ends with a, um, tit-for-tat situation (Seth's pun, but certainly he didn't think of that first), with the women promising to do anything the guys want - provided they do it to each other first. The girls end up sexually dominant, the boys end up objectified, the audience’s voyeurism is exposed; basically everybody wins. A true victory for feminism (wink). It's important to note, of course, that there's only female nudity in these lousy movies, and plenty of it. Oh, man, I really ought to be writing my Closing now. If you see me on AIM, distract me anyway.
